It is often hard to decide for the buyer when two drones of the same kind and in the same drone category are present in the market. A comparison of Ruko F11 Pro vs DJI Mavic drones is here as a review for the buyer so that his decision becomes easier.
Both of them have numerous similarities and this review would be a great help as it presents the pros and cons of both of them. When one has to invest a considerable amount of money in a drone product, then the choice should be well-thought.
The Ruko F11 Pro is an amazing drone with a lot of features. It has a very good camera system, a powerful motor, and a nice design. However, there are some downsides as well. Let’s dig in and get to know more about Roky F11 Pro in this article.
Small size and portability of Ruko F11 Pro
Ruko F11 Pro is a small and portable drone that has several high-quality features that other drones of the same product classification might not have all in one. Although, the price is high if the consumer is still looking for high-quality features deemed best for photo and video shooting then he could optimally go for it.
Batteries, propellers, and brushless motors
The comparison of Ruko F11 Pro vs DJI Mavic drones tells us that Ruko F11 Pro has 2500 mAh batteries giving it a one-hour-long time for having the utmost experience of video shooting and taking still photos.
There are spare propellers that help in smooth flight. The motors present in the device are brushless so that overheating is avoided at the maximum level. It also helps in the least maintenance so that going out of order does not cost the customer again and again after having invested in initial buying.
Flight height and dimensions of Ruko F11 Pro
The brushless motors assist the drone in flying up to a height of 120 meters without distraction, even in resistance created by the wind. The folding feature is an added advantage for the user as he can easily carry and keep it in his bag and belongings, especially when he travels. When in the unfolded position, its dimensions are 17.5 x 15.9 x 3.2 inches and reduce to half of the real measurements when in the folded position.
After making a comparison of Ruko F11 Pro vs DJI Mavic drones, it is noticed that there is high protection feature from crashing since the device is entirely made of high-quality plastic. It also provides a sleek look to the product.
Camera quality and storage of Ruko F11 Pro
The camera features cannot be ignored since the pictures and videos both are captured in 4K HD quality. The field of view that rotates around 120 degrees gives a vast angle for the pictures and video, which is quite a pleasantly surprising feature for the videographers. Moreover, for capturing plentiful photos and videos, there is an extra micro SD card slot.
Transmitter and connectivity
The transmitter possesses state-of-the-art technology with an extended range of connectivity with the app. The drone’s operations become convenient with this connection so that safety and quality are both prioritized at the same time.
With the comparison of Ruko F11 Pro vs DJI Mavic drones, it has been witnessed that GPS-enabled Ruko drone gives a guaranteed safe and stable flight when in the air. The user becomes worry-free when he is controlling the drone.
Speed modes of Ruko F11 Pro
The speed modes could be suitably adjusted per the user’s preference. There are three types of modes: low, medium, and high. It should be considered that when the speed is set to high, the drone would use a higher amount of power.
This certainly means that the flight time could reduce as compared to the overall flight duration that the drone offers. The top speed at which the drone can fly is 26.8 miles per hour. Ruko drone is user-friendly and could be easily operated by new beginners.
Pros and Cons
Despite its useful features like long flight time, user-friendly for new beginners, durable product build, and high-quality intelligent operations, it undoubtedly has other limitations. For example, the comparison of Ruko F11 Pro vs DJI Mavic drones states that there is no hindrance avoidance trait in the Ruko F11 Pro drone.
The collision chances are high when it is in the air, like with the birds. There still is a GPS module that supports in stabilizing the drone when in flight mode, but the steadiness issues still remain.
Also, there is no gimbal stabilizer with the camera that might produce blurred pictures and videos sometimes. Shaky video making could be a turn-off for many users. For this reason, it is recommended that the battery be fully charged; although battery charging time is quite long as well, which is three hours.
Small size and portability of DJI Mavic
The comparison of Ruko F11 Pro vs DJI Mavic drones reveals that the DJI Mavic drone is foldable and becomes the size of one’s palm. It has very similar features to those of the Ruko F11 Pro. It is portable, easy to carry, and light in weight. It could be fittingly packed with the belongings in the travel bag and could be taken for traveling or hiking.
Weight and battery time
Its weight is 250g with a battery that has a capacity of 2400mAh. The powerful battery is able to give a continuous flight time of 30 minutes. The environmental conditions also affect the flight of the drone since the temperature and weather conditions would influence the flight of this drone.
Flight modes of DJI Mavic
The comparison of Ruko F11 Pro vs DJI Mavic drones discloses that certain flight modes are given on the DJI Mavic drone to set it up at specific functioning: regular, sport, smooth, and refined modes. It depends on the user himself which flight mode he would prefer. For instance, skilled pilots should select sports mode.
The weight when the drone takes off is 250g which is suitable for providing a 30-minute flight without disturbance. The height at which it can fly without trouble is 3000m altitude. There is an extra micro SD card slot for the provision of extra space for photos and recorded videos.
Pros and Cons
When a comparison of Ruko F11 Pro vs DJI Mavic drones was scrutinized more deeply, it has been noted that DJI Mavic has a gimbal stabilizer that does not give the user shaky videos or photos, an advantage not present in the Ruko F11 Pro drone. Taking footage in the air has never been easy with the DJI Mavic drone since, with the remote control, the handling is quite easy. With the connectivity of the phone app, the controller works with precision, giving a high performance in acrobatics while in the air.
Another advantage is that DJI Mavic is easily foldable and can be put in pockets or bags that the user might take with him while traveling. For this very reason, it is light in weight. The photos and videos that the user makes give a cinematic feel that could be posted on social media platforms without having to worry about their quality.
Due to its small size, it causes less friction in the air, resulting in better and more stable flight. Also, it is relatively quieter when it is flying due to its compact size again. With the comparison of Ruko F11 Pro vs DJI Mavic drones, the DJI Mavic drone could be personalized as it comes with accessories that are not comprehensively available with other drones of the same category.
Apart from the above-mentioned high-end features, there are some compromises attached to DJI Mavic as well. The photo capturing and video recording are available in 2.7K FHD. The tripod mode is absent which could have added to its stability. Further, although there are three batteries for a multi-charging caddy, they cannot be charged all at the same time.
Another shortfall for DJI Mavic is that its screen size is small. The comparison of Ruko F11 Pro vs DJI Mavic drones tells us that the monitoring could be a hassle when the drone is in the air due to its small size. It is difficult to navigate it and hence, it is not advised. Besides, the micro-USB port might be displeasing for some users since for charging the remote or connecting the drone itself, it would have been better to offer a USB-C port.
Which One Is the Best?
Most of the features of both drones are similar; it is a hard decision to make which one is better. However, both of them have their own respective deficits. If you could invest a bit more, Ruko F11 Pro could be an option for you. On the other side, if better features and greater stability in the air but still with a lower acceptable picture HD quality is desirable, then DJI Mavic could opt.
Also, there is no gimbal stabilizer with the camera that might produce blurred pictures and videos sometimes. The shaky video making could be a turn-off for many users. For this reason, it is recommended that the battery should be fully charged; although battery charging time is quite long as well, which is three hours.